Memorandum
INTRODUCTION My name is Sarah Berthiaume. I am a student at
HISTORY
Gaelic: The Scots-Gaelic language came to
Mi’kmaq: An indigenous First Nations people of
French Acadian: Acadian French is a dialect of French spoken by francophone Acadians primarily in
TECHNOLOGICAL THREAT? Many would agree that the aforementioned languages of
While technology has become infinitely more sophisticated over the past few hundred years, languages have not. Indeed linguistic complexity is seldom greater than on the lips of hunter-gatherers whose material needs are few and whose grasp of the distant world is minimal. Languages… evolve towards simplicity. Kriol is far simpler and more flexible than the Aboriginal languages that nourished it. Italian is a slipshod free-for-all language compared with the Latin from which it sprang (Abley 44).
WHY SO IMPORTANT? Many would agree that the threat of losing one’s own language, be it one’s own communicative identity, is one of substantial power, one that must be looked at and taken care of immediately. In the words of Mark Abley, author of Spoken Here: Travels Among Threatened Languages, “Languages are devoid of hierarchy. Infants emerge from the womb with an absolute equality of linguistic opportunity – whatever sounds they grow up hearing, whatever syllables they start out babbling, any fully developed language can express their needs and desires.” (p. 43). Abley goes on to argue in favor of infants’ abilities to understand and take in language, then their ability to speak it and communicate. The mind is a complex thing that we must not take for granted, and must instead cherish and nurture it so that we may become more intelligent than technology itself leads us to be.
“Reasons Not To Speak” - It isn’t spoken in school - Too much effort to learn - Useless off of the island - English has status and prestige - It can be a secret code –OR- - a weapon for excluding people
These feelings of dismay and remorse towards the languages must be counteracted and made to change by use of positive reinforcements for the languages. You can do this through Public Policy as well as awareness programs and heritage societies.
PUBLIC POLICY Public policy is a course of action designated by public authorities in address to a problem. It is expressed in the body of laws, regulations, decisions and actions of the government. The current policies regarding languages of
DECLINE The decline of the languages spoken in
* Currently,
* The only local historical society I personally know of, without going to great lengths to find[6], is the Whitney Pier Historical Society, one of which does not advocate to the study or preservation of languages. In my search, I have not found any that do advocate for such a cause.
* Workers at these historical societies and museums do not do any primary research for them, other than the work of a handful of volunteer research associates.
* A course in Gaelic was once offered in the local high schools but has recently been abandoned while courses are still offered in Canadian French (not necessarily Acadian) and in Mi’kmaq. There is a relatively small Gaelic community and the only people interested in taking the courses offered at my local college in Gaelic Studies are local historians or those students who are merely interested in learning something new. The numbers are both sparse and fleeting.
In my travels, I do not hear the old languages of Gaelic or Acadian being spoken. I hear what is known merely as “broken Mi’kmaq” which is a sad combination of English phrases and words entangled in the Mi’kmaq language and being spoken only to their families in private. Without your help, these languages will be lost. The unfortunate truth of the matter is that I am unable to raise awareness of these languages on my own. The members of societies dedicated to the preservation of these languages can only do so much while many of them cannot event support their core activity of keeping up with their collection of artifacts and documented information.
CONCLUSIONS My observations are summarized in the following ways:
1) The preservation of languages deserves more funding so as to build awareness and preserve the culture. Nova Scotians value their culture enough to donate artifacts and small monetary funds to the cause for which I am advocating. All that is needed now is more support from the government to ensure that what needs to be done is done.
2) The foundation of these languages rests in the people who speak them. For this reason, we must promote further communications in these languages as well as supportive social institutions aimed towards this goal. For this reason, heritage societies and museums deserve more resources pertaining to these languages. There must be content as well as marketing to entice visitors to the attractions proposed in this memorandum.
3) It is a means to an end to see only tourism as our historical linguistic salvation. For this reason, heavily promoting only tourism attractions strays from the purpose of preserving the language for tourists may come to view but not to immerse themselves into the culture. These languages should be valued fundamentally as cultural assets for
[1] Gillis, Carla. (2005). “Fàilte” Gaelic. Aliant.net. URL accessed 2006/11/23.
[2] Collectively, First Nations, Inuit, and Métis peoples are known as Aboriginal peoples, First peoples, or Indigenous peoples, bands, or nations.
[3] http://www.membertou.ca/about_us.asp
[4] Information concerning language broadcasting obtained on http://en.wikipedia.org Free Encyclopedia, accessed on 25/11/06
[5] http://www.policylibrary.com/canada/ accessed on 25/11/2006
[6] I choose not to otherwise delve deeper into researching my cause simply to prove my argument that easily accessible awareness is needed in order to keep these languages alive.

0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home